4. He could charge innocent people guilty. Even if you are innocent but have accepted a guilty verdict, you must still pay a fine or go to jail for a crime you did not commit. Not only that, but you`ll have a locker that can`t be erased. This type of legal agreement allows both parties to avoid a longer trial and allows the accused to avoid the risk of a conviction in court, which can result in a harsher sentence. The arguments were conducted as a deliberate arrangement that gives a better place to the defendant and the prosecutor, in which the former have different procedural and material rights. However, if the accused pleads liability, he acts his rights against a prosecutor in return for concessions considered to be abandoned rights. With advocacy, the haggling of pleadings has become a hot topic in debates, whether it is good for society or not. To get a good idea of this topic, let`s take a look at its pros and cons. 3. He always creates a criminal record for innocent people.
An innocent person can accept a plea to reduce his or her losses. This agreement means that they will have a criminal record. We can ask you to go to jail. There may be fines or refunds to be paid. Even if a plea is not accepted, there may be a higher legal cost than the cost of what a good deal offers, which leads to the adoption of an agreement. For judges, the main incentive to enter a plea is to reduce the need to plan and hold a trial on an already crowded docket (judicial calendar). Judges are also aware of prison overcrowding and may be sensitive to the „treatment” of offenders charged with low-level crimes. In general, advocacy contributes to increasing the economy of justice and preserving limited resources. A plea is an agreement in the context of a criminal proceeding between the prosecutor and the accused – the person charged for a crime – in which the accused pleads guilty, in exchange for the reduction of the offence or the sentence. There are three types of pleas: after all, pervasive arguments could affect the quality of criminal evidence in general. Cross-examination reveals errors, lies and false theories, but only in court. If more than 90 per cent of convictions come from pleas, the evidence must be strong enough to induce an agreement, not to withstand cross-examination.
Sloppy and falsified drug testing at two different criminal labs in Massachusetts recently led to the failure of 47,000 convictions. Weak evidence also increases the likelihood that innocent people will be charged and forced to plead guilty. (2) It can lead to bad investigations. Given that 90% of cases in many legal systems go to a plea rather than a court proceeding, it is argued that this concept leads to unstable investigative practices. Lawyers and law enforcement officers should not spend time preparing a case because they expect it to commit to it.